I think you have an important point but link it to the wrong happening.
Pride is about what remains to be fought for. But this does not mean there should not also be other events to remember what we won and what this commits us to.
Why try to change what is when it is what is not that is missing.
Work on making the what is not happen, rather than criticize what is from being.
There is a three word problem with discussing the case: same sex marriage. Question 1 if they had a panel: why didn’t couples just say they were opposite sexes the day they married?
I think you have an important point but link it to the wrong happening.
Pride is about what remains to be fought for. But this does not mean there should not also be other events to remember what we won and what this commits us to.
Why try to change what is when it is what is not that is missing.
Work on making the what is not happen, rather than criticize what is from being.
There is a three word problem with discussing the case: same sex marriage. Question 1 if they had a panel: why didn’t couples just say they were opposite sexes the day they married?